UN combat brigade in the DRC and a new resource war




KPFA Evening News, broadcast 12.28.2013

KPFA News Anchor Cameron Jones: Earlier this week, in the northeasternmost province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, or DRC, which borders Central African Republic, South Sudan, and Uganda, the UN's special combat intervention brigade, which includes South African troops, used South African helicopter gunships to fire on the Allied Democratic Forces militia. The UN combat brigade also fired the new South African helicopter gunships on Rwanda and Uganda’s M23 militia two months earlier. South African mining researcher David Van Wyk said that this was not simply a UN operation to eliminate militias in the eastern DRC, as reported, but also the signal of a new resource war which could become another African World War. KPFA’s Ann Garrison spoke to David Van Wyk and filed this report.   

KPFA/Ann Garrison: Yesterday, South African mining researcher David Van Wyk wrote that, quote, “A new resource war is South Africa's helicopter gunship, the Denel Rooivalk, over the eastern DRC about to break out in the DRC. It will be an African World War. The USA is sponsoring opposing sides. France, Belgium, China and Russia will also sponsor their interests in the conflict. This will pit South Africa against Uganda and Rwanda. Angola and Tanzania might also be drawn in. The arms industry will profit greatly, Africans will die in large numbers, and mining companies will look forward to a prosperous 2014.”

Van Wyk further described the conflict and the U.S. sponsorship of opposing sides, from his home in Johannesburg:

David Van Wyk: What we are seeing in the DRC, basically, is a conflict over the resources of the DRC and different mining interests. And Uganda and Rwanda are aspirant mining companies and mineral exporters, whereas South Africa is a dominant minerals power in Africa. And so, South Africa’s deployment of peacekeepers against Ugandan and Rwandan sponsored rebels in the northeast is an indication of the conflict of interest over the control of minerals in the DRC. But what is puzzling about all of this is that the United States is involved with Rwanda, it's involved with Uganda since 1988, and it is involved with South Africa as well through AFRICOM. So what we are seeing in effect is a situation of American weapons fighting against American weapons.  

KPFA/Ann Garrison: South Africa is highly favored in this new war for Congo’s mineral wealth, Van Wyk said, because major industrial mining corporations that operate in South Africa are prepared to move beyond the artisenal mining and smuggling that has so enriched Uganda and Rwanda since their invasion of the DRC in 1996. He also cited South Africa’s advantage as the only African nation where heavy weapons of war are manufactured, although bullets are manufactured and rifles assembled in others. At the same time, he said that because South African weapons industries are fueling the arms race all over the African continent, South African troops are now likely to be facing troops wielding South African weapons.

David Van Wyk: South Africa heavily armed Uganda in 2008, and also, everytime, just before they had elections in Uganda. So we’re actually seeing South African soldiers fighting possibly South African weapons in the hands of rebels sponsored by Uganda.  

KPFA/Ann Garrison: Van Wyk agreed, with journalist Keith Harmon Snow, Professor Ed Herman, Congolese Canadian author Patrick Mbeko, and others that real UN peacekeeping is not possible at this time, because, given U.S. military dominance, it is an inevitably self-interested, hypocritical undertaking by the US and ancillary powers under the guise of multilateral beneficence.

For Pacifica, KPFA and AfrobeatRadio, I'm Ann Garrison.  


Follow Ann Garrison on: